about

A launch desk that publishes its own losses.

I launch memecoins, record what happens to each one, and put the numbers here whether they flatter me or not. 4 launches so far. All of them are dead. The fees came to $173.04, and almost all of that was one launch.

Why

Why publish the failures

Because everyone in this business says they do not rug, and the claim costs nothing to make. A standing list of your own dead launches costs something to keep, and anyone can check it against the chain. That is the only part of a reputation here that is worth anything.

And because the losses are the useful data. A launch that worked tells you almost nothing — you cannot tell skill from a bot passing through. Four launches that died the same way, with the numbers written down, tell you where the actual constraint is. The one finding so far is that the coin was not the variable: two launches three hours apart, same method, same venue, returned $171.36 and $0.15.

Limits

What this is not

Not advice. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy anything, and there is no signal service, no group, and nothing for sale. Most memecoins go to zero. That includes most of mine.

Not a sample. 4 launches is a record, not a rate. Where this site does arithmetic on that record it says it is arithmetic. Anyone quoting a percentage off 4 attempts — including me — is guessing with extra steps.

Not a prediction. The venue readings say what was trading in the last few minutes. They do not say what will trade tomorrow, and a quiet venue this hour is not a forecast about the next one.

Method

How the numbers here work

Every figure regenerates from the launch record and the chain on each build. Nothing is typed into a page by hand, because a hand-typed number goes stale the day after it is written and the page carries on looking confident.

A reading that could not be taken is never shown as a zero. An unreachable RPC, a launchpad that did not answer — those are marked as no reading, in a visibly different shape, everywhere they appear. "We looked and there was nothing" and "we could not look" are different claims and collapsing them is the one mistake this site is built to avoid.

Where a figure cannot be regenerated — the dollar cost of a launch, which needs a price feed the build does not have — it is stated with the date it was true, and flagged as the number most likely to be out of date.

1 research piece, written when a launch is over and not revised afterwards. If one turns out to be wrong it stays up with a correction rather than being quietly edited. The tooling behind all of this is a set of command-line scripts; the ticker checker on this site is the same code, put behind a URL.

Who

Who is behind it

Pseudonymous, deliberately. The launches are on-chain and the contracts are linked from every launch page, so the record is checkable without knowing anything about me — and who I am is not the part you should be trusting.

Posts go to @attritiondesk. Mail reaches me at [email protected]. If you are launching something and want the raw numbers behind any figure on this site, ask — that is what it is for.